Re: PATCH: add support for IN and @> in functional-dependency statistics use

> On 29 Mar 2020, at 17:27, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:22:25AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 13:18, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> OK, I've pushed that with your recommendation for that function name.
>>
>> Does this now complete everything that you wanted to do for functional
>> dependency stats for PG13? Re-reading the thread, I couldn't see
>> anything else that needed looking at. If that's the case, the CF entry
>> can be closed.
>
> Yes. There were two improvements proposed, we've committed one of them
> (the IN/ANY operator handling) and the other (containment) needs more
> discussion. So I think it's OK to mark this either as committed or maybe
> returned with feedback.

Since there hasn't been more discussion on the second item I've closed this
item as committed. The containment part can be opened as a new CF entry.

cheers ./daniel