Re: [PATCH] fix GIN index search sometimes losing results
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] fix GIN index search sometimes losing results |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 856353.1593707640@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] fix GIN index search sometimes losing results (Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] fix GIN index search sometimes losing results
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> writes: > чт, 2 июл. 2020 г. в 19:38, Artur Zakirov <zaartur@gmail.com>: >> So it seems we are losing some results with RUM as well. > For me it is 100% predictable that unmodified RUM is still losing results > as it is still using binary callback. Right, that's in line with what I expected as well. > The main my goal of saving binary legacy callback is that side callers like > RUM will not break immediately but remain in > existing state (i.e. losing results in some queries). I don't really see why that should be a goal here. I think a forced compile error, calling attention to the fact that there's something to fix, is a good thing as long as we do it in a major release. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: