Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?
Дата
Msg-id 8558.1142894925@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?  ("Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com>)
Ответы Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?  ("Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com>)
Список pgsql-docs
"Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com> writes:
> A base backup taken from a running postmaster will still include a
> postmaster.pid file, which will prevent a new postmaster from being
> able to be started.

Usually not; only if the PID mentioned in the file belongs to an
existing process belonging to the postgres userid does Postgres believe
that the pidfile is valid.

It might be worth mentioning this as you suggest, but I think it's a
sufficiently low-probability case that your failure was probably due to
something else.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Thomas F. O'Connell"
Дата:
Сообщение: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?
Следующее
От: "Thomas F. O'Connell"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Online Backups: Minor Caveat, Major Addition?