Re: Design database schemas around a common subset of objects
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Design database schemas around a common subset of objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8555f244-6bc0-51b0-9143-8caeaed150a7@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Design database schemas around a common subset of objects (Erik Wienhold <ewie@mailbox.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Design database schemas around a common subset of objects
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 11/6/21 17:02, Erik Wienhold wrote: > I'm brainstorming ideas on how to design database schemas that share a > common subset of objects and stumbled on some issues. Maybe someone has > experience with such a design. Any ideas are welcome! > > > Because of this issue I'm hesitant going with an extension for this use > case, especially once we have versions with backward-incompatible changes. > Instead I'm thinking about something similar to the update scripts we use > for extensions but checking them into version control for each customer > project. My questions for this are: 1) How stable are the core objects? 2) How divergent are the customer specific requirements? 3) Given 1) and 2) would it be possible to craft extensions that where not customer specific? 4) Are you using or have you looked at Sqitch(https://sqitch.org/)? > > Erik > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: