Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 85508ddd-613c-dd26-cff1-845f6175ff61@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/10/20 7:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> That's unlikely, I think. The regression tests are constructed so that >> the estimates are stable. It's more likely this is some difference in >> rounding behavior, for example. > > The reported delta is in the actual row count, not an estimate. > How could that be subject to roundoff issues? And there's no > delta in the Append's inputs, so this seems like it's a flat-out > miss of a row count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE. > My bad. I've not noticed it's EXPLAIN ANALYZE (COSTS OFF) so I thought it's estimates. You're right this can't be a roundoff error. >> I wonder which msvc builds are used on the machines that fail/pass >> the tests, and if the compiler flags are the same. > > Yeah, this might be a fruitful way to figure out "what's different > from the buildfarm". > Yeah. Also Russell claims to have two "same" machines out of which one works and the other one fails. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: