Re: Null integer columns
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Null integer columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8512.1105221349@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Null integer columns (Jeffrey Tenny <jeffrey.tenny@comcast.net>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeffrey Tenny <jeffrey.tenny@comcast.net> writes: > What are the performance tradeoffs (storage space, query speed) of using > a NULL enabled column versus a NOT-NULL column with a sentinel integer > value? > Not that it matters, but in the event where the column values matter, > the numberic value is a foreign key. Advice on that welcome too. In that case you want to use NULL, because the foreign key mechanism will understand that there's no reference implied. With a sentinel value you'd have to have a dummy row in the master table --- which will cause you enough semantic headaches that you don't want to go there. The performance difference could go either way depending on a lot of other details, but it will be insignificant in any case. Don't screw up your database semantics for it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: