Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
От | Scott Lamb |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 84C43D38-773E-11D7-BAD8-000393D581B8@slamb.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Friday, Apr 25, 2003, at 10:16 US/Central, Robert Treat wrote: > On Fri, 2003-04-25 at 08:51, justin@postgresql.org wrote: >> There was a private mailing list that the people who volunteered >> subscribed to. > > I'd just like to put forth the opinion that the private list/discussion > is the reason why it never got off the ground. I have to agree with this. I just don't understand why the websites are developed so differently from source code. In fact, I just don't really understand how people get involved in improving the website when there's not even a public mailing list. I've complained about problems with the website before and offered to help fix them, in whatever other mailing list it's spilled over to. I don't have the time to consistently pump stuff out...but that's never a problem in source projects. I can contribute a patch, wander off, contribute another, and my contributions are still welcome. I'd really like to see all the websites in the same place, with a publically accessible repository, with commit emails, with public mailing lists. Developed like a source code project. Can Bricolage (or whatever CMS system you're leaning toward now) do that? Scott
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: