Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
От | Serge Rielau |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 84BEB3BF-D70E-4913-98ED-C92F59EFE7DE@rielau.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > With Postgres we should to think much more about other PL - there is not only PL/pgSQL. So any what we create should beavailable for any PL. Our PLpgSQL is based on total different technology design - so some benefits of sharing compiledcode across databases has not too value in Postgres. Let me stress one last point: MODULE’s are 100% orthogonal to PLpgSQL as implement by SFDC and also orthogonal to SQL PL as implemented by DB2. Modules can (and do for us) contain C-functions of example. Similarly when the community provides provides server side session variables I have no doubt they will integrate with MODULE’swith very little work. It’s a DDL and name resolution game, predominantly Cheers Serge
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: