Re: BUG #19059: PostgreSQL fails to evaluate the cheaper expression first, leading to 45X performance degradation

> On Sep 20, 2025, at 14:19, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> While we've not gotten a huge amount of push-back about the top-level
> re-ordering, there's been some complaints.  So I'm not eager to
> propagate the idea further down.

And tangentially, doesn't the SQL standard make it implementation-defined if OR short-circuits or not?