Re: best OS and HW for postgreSQL
От | Hakan Kocaman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: best OS and HW for postgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 84AAD313D71B1D4F9EE20E739CC3B6ED013DEC07@ATLANTIK-CL.intern.digame.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: best OS and HW for postgreSQL (Ray Stell <stellr@cns.vt.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
hi, yep :~) compiled from source on Suse 9.2 (not SLES 9) best regards Hakan > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Ray Stell > Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 5:03 PM > To: Scott Marlowe > Cc: Jim Nasby; Raul Retamozo; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [ADMIN] best OS and HW for postgreSQL > > > > I'm curious about the "[ADMIN] COPY FROM command v8.1.4" thread > as it applies to this thread. The COPY thread pointed to kernel > issues in x86_64 GNU/Linux SLES 9. I'm wondering if x86_64 is not > a good move for pg servers at this time. Are there happy x86_64 > production deployments? > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:44:32AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 20:18 -0400, Jim Nasby wrote: > > > > > > In general, you're probably best off running whatever OS > you're most > > > comfortable with. > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: