Re: a common place for pl/perlu modules
| От | Alexey Klyukin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: a common place for pl/perlu modules |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 849E83B0-321F-4025-A37C-F73E33E7533B@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: a common place for pl/perlu modules (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: a common place for pl/perlu modules
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 11, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Alexey Klyukin wrote: >> Hello, >> >> When developing pl/perlu functions common definitions and methods are often stored in external .pm modules. During deploymentthe modules should be installed somewhere in @INC to be reachable by the perl interpreter. However, installingthe modules to a location outside of the PG installation makes it hard to have a consistent environment when runningmultiple PG versions on the same host. What do you think about defining a canonical place for pl/perlu .pm modules(i.e. PKGLIBDIR) and adding this location to @INC during the interpreter initialization ? Another idea is to allowa user to specify such location by adding a new custom GUC variable. >> >> >> > > Why won't setting this in the new on_perl_init setting work? It's even included in to documented examples using the standardlib module: <http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/plperl-under-the-hood.html#PLPERL-CONFIG> The lack of support for SPI functions makes this hardly an adequate solution. I do have both modules and SPI calls in severalpl/perlu functions. -- Alexey Klyukin http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: