Re: Bug in pg_restore with EventTrigger in parallel mode
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in pg_restore with EventTrigger in parallel mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8445.1583780375@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in pg_restore with EventTrigger in parallel mode (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in pg_restore with EventTrigger in parallel mode
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziomello@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Which, TBH, makes me wonder about the validity of the original complaint >> in this thread. I don't mind delaying ET restore as long as we feasibly >> can; but if you have an ET that is going to misbehave during restore, >> you are in for pain, and it's hard to consider that that pain isn't >> self-inflicted. > The proposed patch solve the original complain. I was just trying to > understand completely what you pointed out before and I agree with you. > Thanks for the clear explanation. OK, thanks for confirming that this solves your issue in practice. > About the patch LGTM and IMHO we should back-patch it to all supported > versions. Done. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: