=?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziomello@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Which, TBH, makes me wonder about the validity of the original complaint
>> in this thread. I don't mind delaying ET restore as long as we feasibly
>> can; but if you have an ET that is going to misbehave during restore,
>> you are in for pain, and it's hard to consider that that pain isn't
>> self-inflicted.
> The proposed patch solve the original complain. I was just trying to
> understand completely what you pointed out before and I agree with you.
> Thanks for the clear explanation.
OK, thanks for confirming that this solves your issue in practice.
> About the patch LGTM and IMHO we should back-patch it to all supported
> versions.
Done.
regards, tom lane