Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 841dd9fb-3550-dce0-e9ff-8f64cac9f15d@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Unified logging system for command-line programs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 31/12/2018 16:55, Andres Freund wrote: > I think we should aim to unify the use (in contrast to the > implementation) of logging as much as possible, rather than having a > separate API for it for client programs. I opted against doing that, for mainly two reasons: One, I think the ereport() API is too verbose for this purpose, an invocation is usually two to three lines. My goal was to make logging smaller and more compact. Two, I think tying error reporting to flow control does not always work well and leads to bad code and a bad user experience. Relatedly, rewriting all the frontend programs to exception style would end up being a 10x project to rewrite everything for no particular benefit. Going from 8 or so APIs to 2 is already an improvement, I think. If someone wants to try going further, it can be considered, but it would be an entirely different project. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: