On 30.09.25 11:03, David Rowley wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 18:24, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>> Quick follow-up: How about we rename pg_builtin_integer_constant_p to
>> pg_integer_constant_p, since it's not actually built-in? See attached
>> patch.
>
> Seems like a good idea.
>
> The patch looks good. Thanks for fixing the __builtin_const_p typo
> that I managed to introduce too :|
pushed