Re: postgresql idle
От | Andrew Rawnsley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql idle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 83B09A16-9A17-11D8-BDB5-000393A47FCC@ravensfield.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql idle (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql idle
Re: postgresql idle |
Список | pgsql-general |
I find that some clients (DBVisualizer for one) do exactly that - execute the COMMIT;BEGIN sequence, and leaves idle transactions on a consistent basis. On Apr 29, 2004, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:04:47PM -0400, Jon Pastore wrote: >> pgsql thought there was a transaction in progress and was waiting >> for it to complete when in fact the commit had already taken place. > > Come again? That doesn't sound possible. What ismore likely is that > somebody issues COMMIT;BEGIN; all at once. You get one transaction > through, but you still end up idle in transaciton. > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to > majordomo@postgresql.org) > -------------------- Andrew Rawnsley President The Ravensfield Digital Resource Group, Ltd. (740) 587-0114 www.ravensfield.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: