Re: BUG #17969: Assert failed in bloom_init() when false_positive_rate = 0.25
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17969: Assert failed in bloom_init() when false_positive_rate = 0.25 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 836412.1686502986@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #17969: Assert failed in bloom_init() when false_positive_rate = 0.25 (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17969: Assert failed in bloom_init() when false_positive_rate = 0.25
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > The following script: > CREATE TABLE tbl (i int); > CREATE INDEX idx ON tbl USING brin (i int4_bloom_ops(false_positive_rate = > 0.25)); > INSERT INTO tbl VALUES(1); > triggers an assertion failure: > TRAP: failed Assert("(false_positive_rate >= BLOOM_MIN_FALSE_POSITIVE_RATE) > && (false_positive_rate < BLOOM_MAX_FALSE_POSITIVE_RATE)"), File: > "brin_bloom.c", Line: 282, PID: 1062784 > Reproduced starting from 77b88cd1b. Hmph. Surely that should read "false_positive_rate <= BLOOM_MAX_FALSE_POSITIVE_RATE" ? > Maybe that Assert is not needed at all... Seems a little excessive to me too, given the comment near the #define that the range limits are pretty arbitrary. Perhaps what would be suitable is "Assert(false_positive_rate > 0 && false_positive_rate < 1)" to show that we don't need to check for failure of the subsequent log() call, and that the log() must be negative so that the nbits result will be sane. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: