Re: replication_slots usability issue
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replication_slots usability issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 835C001D-7F0B-4C90-BFB3-5D6EE5E71A21@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | replication_slots usability issue ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: replication_slots usability issue
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On October 29, 2018 1:31:56 PM EDT, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >-Hackers, > > >Working on 9.6 today (unsure if fixed in newer versions). Had an issue >where the wal was 280G despite max_wal_size being 8G. Found out there >were stale replication slots from a recent base backup. I went to drop >the replication slots and found that since the wal_level was set to >minimal vs replica or higher, I couldn't drop the replication slot. >Clearly that makes sense for creating a replication slot but it seems >like an artificial limitation for dropping them. Uh, huh? How did you manage to start a server with existing slots with that configuration? It should have errored out atstart... Andres Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: