Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8355.1245427970@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: rc1 tarball contains partially outdated/missing man pages
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On Thursday 18 June 2009 23:15:53 Tom Lane wrote: >> BTW, as far as that particular point goes: maybe we could fix the tools >> issues underlying this, but I'm tempted to think that it's not worth the >> trouble, because making these man pages be aliases for SELECT is just >> the Wrong Thing anyway. I think we should just split them off and have >> them be documented as separate top-level reference pages. > Umm, the reason why it is that way now is that you did not want them to be > separate top-level man pages: > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/19886.1226171409@sss.pgh.pa.us Well, at the time I thought that WITH would only be a sub-clause of SELECT. The idea that we might allow it to be attached to INSERT etc causes me to revise my opinion a bit. Do you have a preference one way or the other about how to do this? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: