Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM
От | Jacob Champion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 83053b47978225c7fdb72a0d9b23755fbd40d4db.camel@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Pull general SASL framework out of SCRAM
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2021-07-11 at 13:16 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:31:48PM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 16:27 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > > + * outputlen: The length (0 or higher) of the client response buffer, > > > + * invalid if output is NULL. > > > > nitpick: maybe "ignored" instead of "invalid"? > > Thanks, applied as 44bd012 after using your suggestion. Thanks! > Another thing I noticed after more review is that the check in > fe-auth.c to make sure that a message needs to be generated if the > exchange is not completed yet has no need to depend on "success", only > "done". Ah, right. I think the (!done && !success) case is probably indicative of an API smell, but that's probably something to clean up in a future pass. --Jacob
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: