Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 83047643-c352-4d3b-b886-cd0f0d071289@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/18/21 3:54 PM, John Naylor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:44 PM John Naylor > <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com <mailto:john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 9:56 AM Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com > <mailto:peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>> wrote: > > > - After reading the discussion a few times, I'm not so sure anymore > > > whether making this a cousin of date_trunc is the right way to go. As > > > you mentioned, there are some behaviors specific to date_trunc that > > > don't really make sense in date_trunc_interval, and maybe we'll have > > > more of those. > > For v10, I simplified the behavior by decoupling the behavior from > date_trunc() and putting in some restrictions as discussed earlier. It's > much simpler now. It could be argued that it goes too far in that > direction, but it's easy to reason about and we can put back some > features as we see fit. Peter, thoughts on the new patch? Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: