Re: Wire protocol: type-specific opt-in to binary format
От | Florian Weimer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wire protocol: type-specific opt-in to binary format |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 82mxbla84i.fsf@mid.bfk.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wire protocol: type-specific opt-in to binary format (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Florian Pflug: >>> If you use the extended query protocol, the client can already choose >>> text vs. binary representation on a per-column basis. You can query >>> the result's column types by issuing a Describe message after the >>> Parse message. For each column you can then decide whether you want >>> textual or binary representation, and include that choice in the >>> subsequent Bind message. >> >> Interesting. Doesn't this introduce another roundtrip? > > Yes. Maybe that's also something that should go on the next protocol version > todo list. Okay. > In any case, this is something that solely concerns the client library > (libpq, JDBC, ...), not users of that library, and should thus be handled > on the protocol level, not via a GUC. How is this different from the bytea_output GUC? libpq doesn't hide that at all, but the JDBC driver does---similar to the text/binary distinction. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: