Re: TOAST, large objects, and ACIDity
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TOAST, large objects, and ACIDity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 82FA1DB6-7CB3-43D7-A419-2F46AC070AF1@decibel.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | TOAST, large objects, and ACIDity (Benoit Mathieu <benoit.mathieu@mist-technologies.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jul 10, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Benoit Mathieu wrote: > I want to use postgres to store data and large files, typically > audio files from 100ko to 20Mo. For those files, I just need to > store et retrieve them, in an ACID way. (I don't need search, or > substring, or others functionnalities) > I saw postgres offers at least 2 method : bytea column with TOAST, > or large objects API. > > I wonder what are the differences of the 2 methods. > * I found that large objects need a vacuum after delete to really > release place. That may be handled by a trigger or automatic > vaccum, is it right ? > * Large objects are used via a special API available in libpq C > client library. > * I really care keeping my transaction fully ACID. Documentation on > large objects doesn't explicitly say if lo_import an lo_export (and > other primitives) are fully ACID. Some ideas ? AFAIK large objects are ACID, at least as ACID as you can be when dealing directly with the filesystem (lo_export). Bytea is fully ACID. > * I going to bench insertion and read with this 2 methods. I'd be interested to know what you find. Unless there's a notable speed difference, I'd probably just go with bytea. -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: