Re: Pet Peeves?
От | Steve Atkins |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pet Peeves? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 82C40C7A-2802-4879-931C-17FF6FFF97E2@blighty.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pet Peeves? (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 29, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Gregory Stark wrote: > Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> writes: > >> 6. Where's my CPAN equivalent? Postgresql is extensible, but it's >> hard to find >> the extension you need, and often harder than it should be to >> install. > > FWIW our CPAN equivalent is pgfoundry. I don't think we quite have the > critical mass yet that Perl has to really make it a big success > though. Kinda. It's much more like a freshmeat/sourceforge equivalent than a CPAN equivalent. There's no standard package format, no dependency or version handling, no possibility of automated installation. It also has a mixture of postgresql modules, client-side code that can access postgresql and even occasional projects that have nothing much to do with postgresql. > Making modules more, uh, modular, so they can be installed and > uninstalled > smoothly and preferably without special access privileges is a > recognized > issue though. Yup, that's one prerequisite for the rest of it, really. pgTap, which we have now, was probably another. Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: