Re: pg_dump losing index column collations for unique and primarykeys
От | Alexey Bashtanov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump losing index column collations for unique and primarykeys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 82921d03-9957-a3e5-09a0-d87b052104b5@imap.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump losing index column collations for unique and primary keys (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump losing index column collations for unique and primary keys
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> Well, I disagree that that's a high-priority use case, but it seems to me > that you can still do it. You just can't call the index the pkey until > the column collation agrees. So roughly it'd be > > * CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ... (col COLLATE new-collation) > * Drop old pkey (the new index is still enforcing uniqueness) > * ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... COLLATE new-collation > * ALTER TABLE ADD PRIMARY KEY USING INDEX > > These seem to me to be pretty much exactly the same steps you'd need > today, although maybe the current code is more forgiving about > their ordering. Agreed. >> Disallowing changing the direction (ASC/DESC) also looks cruel to me. > That restriction has been there since day one, and we have had a grand > total of zero complaints about it. True, my bad. What do you think of making pg_dump warn the user if they are trying to dump a weird PK/UK which has collations in index and column not matching? And maybe even throw an error in case of --binary-upgrade? >> BTW with playing with this stuff I came across another issue, >> which seems unrelated to collations: > Yeah, see > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/10365.1558909428@sss.pgh.pa.us > If you'd like to help move things along by reviewing that patch, > it'd be great. I'll have a look. Best, Alex
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: