Re: Comments on Database Broken
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Comments on Database Broken |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8285.990472181@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Comments on Database Broken (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org writes: > When comments are added to a database (testdb in this example) (either > at the point of creation or using the "comment on database ..." > command) they may be stored either at the system level or within the > individual database storage area. There is no such thing as comments "stored at the system level". Comments live in pg_description which is a per-database table. I think you are confusing the behavior of comments stored in template1 (which will get copied to subsequently-created databases) with a true installation-wide table. We could theoretically answer this by making a pg_global_description table that is installation-wide like pg_database, but I'm not convinced that it's worth worrying about. I'm not even convinced that the behavior is wrong: why shouldn't each DB be able to have its own comment on the other DBs? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: