Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight
От | Florian Weimer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 82643vcri0.fsf@mid.bfk.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
* Greg Smith: > With much appreciated contributions from others including Chris Browne > in particular, I've now finished up the original scope of what I > wanted to cover on this topic: > > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Why_PostgreSQL_instead_of_MySQL I think for fairness, you should mention that PostgreSQL's MVCC locking does not properly implement the SERIALIZABLE semantics. For some table types (InnoDB, IIRC), MySQL implements phantom key logging, so it gets more cases right. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: