Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 81f74732-fca5-4f4b-1f52-645f84a8d9fa@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/06/19 16:43, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > At Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:36:09 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:13:27PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> Agreed. But isn't it too late to remove the columns (i.e., change >>> the catalog) for v13? Because v13 beta1 was already released. >>> IIUC the catalog should not be changed since beta1 release so that >>> users can upgrade PostgreSQL without initdb. >> >> Catalog bumps have happened in the past between beta versions: >> git log -p REL_12_BETA1..REL_12_BETA2 src/include/catalog/catversion.h >> git log -p REL_11_BETA1..REL_11_BETA2 src/include/catalog/catversion.h >> git log -p REL_10_BETA1..REL_10_BETA2 src/include/catalog/catversion.h >> >> So we usually avoid to do that between betas, but my take here is that >> a catalog bump is better than regretting a change we may have to live >> with after the release is sealed. Sounds reasonable. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: