Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Дата
Msg-id 81ce3e64469db60b2b79173aca8a54b6cc2680b8.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 20:55 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> +        XLogRecPtr    EndPtr =
> pg_atomic_read_u64(&XLogCtl->xlblocks[curridx]);
> +
> +        /*
> +         * xlblocks value can be InvalidXLogRecPtr before
> the new WAL buffer
> +         * page gets initialized in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer.
> In such a case
> +         * re-read the xlblocks value under the lock to
> ensure the correct
> +         * value is read.
> +         */
> +        if (unlikely(XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(EndPtr)))
> +        {
> +            LWLockAcquire(WALBufMappingLock,
> LW_EXCLUSIVE);
> +            EndPtr = pg_atomic_read_u64(&XLogCtl-
> >xlblocks[curridx]);
> +            LWLockRelease(WALBufMappingLock);
> +        }
> +
> +        Assert(!XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(EndPtr));

Can that really happen? If the EndPtr is invalid, that means the page
is in the process of being cleared, so the contents of the page are
undefined at that time, right?

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: