Re: [GENERAL] getting the currval of a sequence
От | James Olin Oden |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] getting the currval of a sequence |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 81Aug13.101844edt.35713@gateway.lee.k12.nc.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [GENERAL] getting the currval of a sequence ("Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson@cpsgroup.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> > > I think you should just go with what Vadim suggested and use: > > > select currval('my_sequence'); > > > This will be the same within a transaction, even if there is another > > > transaction using the same sequence. > > > > Sorry, I wasn't thinking of it happening in the same transaction. In > > that > > case that would be the thing to do. If on the other hand you needed > > that > > number over multiple transactions, wouldn't what I had suggested work? > > > > ...james > > > Yes it would, but your suggestion introduces problems of it's own. The > whole point of a transaction is encapsulate a logical unit of work, such > that it all succeeds together or it all fails together. This would > include the incrementing of the sequence. The way that you are > suggestion you would always increment the sequence even if you never > used it, it just seems like a waste to me Yikes, I didn't think of that. I suppose with 4 billion sequence numbers you could waste a few, but...things always seem grow beyon their intended purposes. I guess your absolutely right on this one...james
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: