Re: Re: libpq++
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: libpq++ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 818.988918936@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | libpq++ ("J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: libpq++
|
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Justin Banks <justinb@tricord.com> writes: > You're right - this only works because the shared connections all > occur in the same address space. It doesn't buy you anything between > applications, only inside an application. The problem is that there's > no way for different instantiations of classes inheriting > database-ness from the PgDatabase class to share a PGconn* unless the > PgDatabase class provides a way for different instantiations to know > that existing connections are available. And what's wrong with a static class variable for that purpose? The shmem segment looks like the hardest possible way to get the same result. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: