Re: Re: libpq++

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Re: libpq++
Дата
Msg-id 818.988918936@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на libpq++  ("J. T. Vermeulen" <jtv@cistron-office.nl>)
Ответы Re: Re: libpq++
Список pgsql-interfaces
Justin Banks <justinb@tricord.com> writes:
> You're right - this only works because the shared connections all
> occur in the same address space. It doesn't buy you anything between
> applications, only inside an application. The problem is that there's
> no way for different instantiations of classes inheriting
> database-ness from the PgDatabase class to share a PGconn* unless the
> PgDatabase class provides a way for different instantiations to know
> that existing connections are available.

And what's wrong with a static class variable for that purpose?
The shmem segment looks like the hardest possible way to get the
same result.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: libpq++
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: libpq++