Re: On aclocal.m4
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On aclocal.m4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 811.960822888@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | On aclocal.m4 (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: On aclocal.m4
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > aclocal comes with automake as does the AM_PROG_MISSING macro that > configure uses now. Note that this does not mean that anyone working on > configure.in needs to have automake installed, only those that are adding > external macro definitions. ... or editing existing ones to fix bugs ... in practice, as you push more of configure's functionality into macros (which I agree is nice from a readability standpoint) it will become almost impossible to work on configure without modifying config/*.m4. As things stood over the weekend, even just pulling from CVS required automake, since aclocal.m4 may or may not get a newer timestamp than the config/*.m4 files. I temporarily diked out the toplevel make dependencies that tried to update aclocal.m4, but the issue needs discussion. I'd like to be convinced that automake is actually going to be a win for Postgres before we start requiring developers to have it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: