SQLSetPos with SQL_POSITION
От | tomas@nocrew.org (Tomas Skäre) |
---|---|
Тема | SQLSetPos with SQL_POSITION |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 80he1fw2uu.fsf@junk.nocrew.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: SQLSetPos with SQL_POSITION
|
Список | pgsql-odbc |
Hi, I have a question that might be more generally about ODBC. As I've understood it, the SQLSetPos function, when doing UPDATE/REFRESH/DELETE uses the rownumber within the currently fetched rowset, while POSITION sets the cursor on the row number on the whole result set. Or am I wrong here? Does POSITION also work only within the current rowset? With pgsql-odbc I get a "Row out of range" error when trying to do SQLSetPos with SQL_POSITION and a rownumber other than 1. The rowset size is set to 1 (one). If I have made a select, I want to make a function that will update one or several rows in this selection. Is it correct ODBC that I have to do an SQLFetchScroll first, to set the cursor on the row I want to update, and then use SQLSetPos with SQL_UPDATE to do the update? From reading MSDN ODBC API, I got the impression that I could do an SQLSetPos with SQL_POSITION, instead of the SQLFetchScroll. I've set the cursor type to keyset driven and concurrency to ROWVER, and I've compiled the psqlodbc from CVS with odbcver=0x0300. I'm pretty new to ODBC, so I'm not familiar with all kinds of cursors and such that are best for me. Any help to enlighten me is appreciated. Also, are there any more good documentation for the ODBC API than the MSDN pages? Greetings, Tomas
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: