Re: some pg_dump query code simplification
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: some pg_dump query code simplification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8085.1535493957@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: some pg_dump query code simplification (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification
Re: some pg_dump query code simplification |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > I wonder- what if we had an option to pg_dump to explicitly tell it what > the server's version is and then have TAP tests to run with different > versions? Uh ... telling it what the version is doesn't make that true, so I'd have no confidence in a test^H^H^H^Hkluge done that way. The way to test is to point it at an *actual* back-branch server. Andrew has a buildfarm module that does precisely that, although I'm not sure what its test dataset is --- probably the regression database from each branch. I also have a habit of doing such testing manually whenever I touch version-sensitive parts of pg_dump. Dunno about the idea of running the pg_dump TAP tests against back branches. I find that code sufficiently unreadable that maintaining several more copies of it doesn't sound like fun at all. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: