Re: Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?
От | Rainer Bauer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Npsql is much faster than ODBC ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8052j3hc363pb0jnf959do9kuu8rta824h@4ax.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Npsql is much faster than ODBC ? (一首诗 <newptcai@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Npsql is much faster than ODBC ?
Re: Npsql is much faster than ODBC ? |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Joshua D. Drake" wrote: >> psqlodbc is licenced under LGPL, but ODBCng uses the GPL. >> >> That means that commercial software cannot use the ODBCng driver. Are >> there any plans to release it under LGPL licence? > >The only time this would be an issue is if you tried to embed the >driver. Other than that, you are more than welcome to use closed source >software against the ODBCng driver. That's nice to hear. But I respect licences as they are and the ODBCng driver is licenced under the GPL. So is this an _official_ statement from CommandPrompt that the driver can be used in commercial applications? If so then either this should be stated on the drivers' page (or the licence should be changed to LGPL). Rainer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: