Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8051.1346183955@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump incorrect output in plaintext mode
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I don't see anything particularly incorrect about that. The point of >> the --verbose switch is to track what pg_dump is doing, and if what >> it's doing involves going through RestoreArchive(), why should we try >> to hide the fact? > "restoring data for table 't'" makes you think it's actuall restoring > things. It's not. That dumping is implemented by calling an internal > function called RestoreArchive() has to be an implementation detail... > It certainly confuses users that we say "restoring" when we're not > doing that... Well, why don't we just s/restoring/processing/ in the debug message, and call it good? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: