Re: Tackling JsonPath support
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Tackling JsonPath support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 80228378-f5ba-1291-872b-9812e103e37c@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Tackling JsonPath support (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Tackling JsonPath support
Re: Tackling JsonPath support |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 29/11/16 07:37, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > 2016-11-29 7:34 GMT+01:00 Christian Convey <christian.convey@gmail.com > <mailto:christian.convey@gmail.com>>: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Pavel Stehule > <pavel.stehule@gmail.com <mailto:pavel.stehule@gmail.com>>wrote: > > We now support XPath function - JSONPath is similar to XPath - > it is better for user, because have to learn only one language. > > > I'm not sure I understand. > > Are you suggesting that we use XPath, not JSONPath, as our language > for json-path expressions? > > > surely not. > > follow ANSI/SQL :) > Just to add to this, the SQL/JSON proposals I've seen so far, and what Oracle, MSSQL and Teradata chose to implement already is basically subset of jsonpath (some proposals/implementations also include lax/strict prefix keyword on top of that). I think that should give us some hint on what the base functionality should look like. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: