Re: move to usenet?
От | David W Noon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: move to usenet? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7jme11-0m2.ln1@my-pc.ntlworld.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: move to usenet? ("David Olbersen" <DOlbersen@stbernard.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 20 Aug 2003 22:58 in <3F43EEEB.5010304@fireserve.net>, Dennis Gearon (gearond@fireserve.net) wrote: > I prefer NOT to have to scroll down to the bottom of an email anyway. I > think discussion list emails like ours need to be like your medical > records, the most important, recent stuff is at the top. This approach puts answers out of the context of their related questions. Virtually all Usenet newsgroups and private mailing lists are Q&A style technical support forums. They are not at all like medical records, which are mostly logs of empirical data. Consequently, the "medical records" analogy is really a poor one for a context like the one in which this meta-discussion is occurring. Instead, the person replying to a message should trim that message down to the specific parts to which the follow-up will pertain, and then place each answer immediately after the question or observation to which it is replying. This has been the Usenet convention for over 15 years [and a Fidonet convention even before that]. > I'm not exactly sure what full quoting is. Full-quoting is the retention of those parts of a message to which the follow-up message is not replying. See my follow-up to David Olbersen's message for an explanation of why this is poor practice. -- Regards, Dave [RLU#314465] ====================================================== dwnoon@spamtrap.ntlworld.com (David W Noon) Remove spam trap to reply via e-mail. ======================================================
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: