Re: Triage on old commitfest entries
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Triage on old commitfest entries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7fe0f1ec-5f48-15b2-7cac-a943eef4f74d@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Triage on old commitfest entries (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/5/21 4:29 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > Greetings, > > * Peter Geoghegan (pg@bowt.ie) wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 1:30 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Fair. My concern here is mostly that we not just keep kicking the >>> can down the road. If we see that a patch has been hanging around >>> this long without reaching commit, we should either kill it or >>> form a specific plan for how to advance it. >> >> Also fair. >> >> The pandemic has made the kind of coordination I refer to harder in >> practice. It's the kind of thing that face to face communication >> really helps with. > > Entirely agree with this. Index skip scan is actually *ridiculously* > useful in terms of an improvement, and we need to get the right people > together to work on it and get it implemented. I'd love to see this > done for v15, in particular. Who do we need to coordinate getting > together to make it happen? I doubt that I'm alone in wanting to make > this happen and I'd be pretty surprised if we weren't able to bring the > right folks together this fall to make it a reality. I don't have the skills to work on either side of this, but I would like to voice my support in favor of having this feature and I would be happy to help test it on a user level (as opposed to reviewing code). -- Vik Fearing
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: