Re: SQL:2011 Valid-Time Support
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL:2011 Valid-Time Support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7f0286bd-cf68-d698-e14b-e283aa6ebd00@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL:2011 Valid-Time Support (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL:2011 Valid-Time Support
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/8/18 11:31, Tom Lane wrote: > Paul Howells <paul.steven.howells@gmail.com> writes: >> Has there been or is there any current effort to implement SQL:2011 >> valid-time support in Postgres? > > Searching the archives, I can only find "valid-time" appearing in these > threads related to temporal query processing: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/200702100020.28893.wt%40penguintechs.org That looks like a pre-standardization variant of the same idea. > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALNdv1h7TUP24Nro53KecvWB2kwA67p%2BPByDuP6_1GeESTFgSA%40mail.gmail.com I think those are operators that work on top of having the valid-time available, but don't do anything about making that time available. > Anyway, if it's in the standard, then at least in principle we're open > to it. There'd probably be some questions about the amount of added > complexity and whether the feature is worth supporting. I'd suggest > trying to get some community buy-in by circulating a design document > on -hackers before you write any code. I think there is some interest, so it's worth proceeding like that. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: