Re: brininsert optimization opportunity
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: brininsert optimization opportunity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7ea7a161-b28a-4c68-8241-ac513d5e0569@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: brininsert optimization opportunity (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: brininsert optimization opportunity
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Here's two patched to deal with this open item. 0001 is a trivial fix of typos and wording, I moved it into a separate commit for clarity. 0002 does the actual fix - adding the index_insert_cleanup(). It's 99% the patch Alvaro shared some time ago, with only some minor formatting tweaks by me. I've also returned to this Alvaro's comment: > Lastly, I kinda disagree with the notion that only some of the callers > of aminsert should call aminsertcleanup, even though btree doesn't > have an aminsertcleanup and thus it can't affect TOAST or catalogs. which was a reaction to my earlier statement about places calling index_insert(): > There's a call in toast_internals.c, but that seems OK because that > only deals with btree indexes (and those don't need any cleanup). The > same logic applies to unique_key_recheck(). The rest goes through > execIndexing.c, which should do the cleanup in ExecCloseIndices(). I think Alvaro is right, so I went through all index_insert() callers and checked which need the cleanup. Luckily there's not that many of them, only 5 in total call index_insert() directly: 1) toast_save_datum (src/backend/access/common/toast_internals.c) This is safe, because the index_insert() passes indexInfo=NULL, so there can't possibly be any cache. If we ever decide to pass a valid indexInfo, we can add the cleanup, now it seems pointless. Note: If someone created a BRIN index on a TOAST table, that'd already crash, because BRIN blindly dereferences the indexInfo. Maybe that should be fixed, but we don't support CREATE INDEX on TOAST tables. 2) heapam_index_validate_scan (src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c) Covered by the committed fix, adding cleanup to validate_index. 3) CatalogIndexInsert (src/backend/catalog/indexing.c) Covered by all callers also calling CatalogCloseIndexes, which in turn calls ExecCloseIndices and cleanup. 4) unique_key_recheck (src/backend/commands/constraint.c) This seems like the only place missing the cleanup call. 5) ExecInsertIndexTuples (src/backend/executor/execIndexing.c) Should be covered by ExecCloseIndices, called after the insertions. So it seems only (4) unique_key_recheck needs the extra call (it can't really happen higher because the indexInfo is a local variable). So the 0002 patch adds the call. The patch also adds a test for this (or rather tweaks an existing one). It's a bit too late for me to push this now, I'll do so early tomorrow. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: