Re: Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7e567320-aa92-079f-d157-5526edf929b4@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup ignores the existing data directory permissions (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/26/19 3:59 AM, Haribabu Kommi wrote: > > I am really questioning if we should keep this stuff isolated within > pg_basebackup or not. At the same time, it may be confusing to have > BASE_BACKUP only use the permissions inherited from the data > directory, so some input from folks maintaining an external backup > tool is welcome. > > > That would be good to hear what other external backup tool authors > think of this change. I'm OK with the -g (inherit|none|group) option as implemented. I prefer the default as it is (inherit), which makes sense since I wrote it that way. Having BASE_BACKUP set the permissions inside the tar file seems OK as well. I'm not aware of any external solutions that are using the replication protocol directly - I believe they all use pg_basebackup, so I don't think they would need to change anything. Having said that, I think setting permissions is a pretty trivial thing to do and there are plenty of possible scenarios that are still not covered here. I have no objections to the patch but it seems like overkill. Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: