Re: Executing on the connection?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Executing on the connection? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7e10dc93-dd36-6494-9d7a-6cad3cecacdb@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Executing on the connection? (Denis Laxalde <denis.laxalde@dalibo.com>) |
Список | psycopg |
On 12/8/20 5:51 AM, Denis Laxalde wrote: > Daniele Varrazzo a écrit : >> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 11:20, Daniele Varrazzo >> <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm toying with the idea of adding a 'connection.execute(query, >>> [params])' methd, which would basically just create a cursor >>> internally, query on it, and return it. No parameter could be passed >>> to the cursor() call, so it could only create the most standard, >>> client-side cursor (or whatever the default for the connection is, if >>> there is some form of cursor_factory, which hasn't been implemented in >>> psycopg3 yet). For anything more fancy, cursor() should be called >>> explicitly. >> >> This is what I've pushed earlier: >> >> https://www.psycopg.org/psycopg3/docs/connection.html#psycopg3.Connection.execute >> >> > > It did not strike me earlier, but it looks a bit weird to have > connection.execute() return a "cursor" to read results while this > "cursor" can also be used to execute commands. So, perhaps, another > object, with only the interface for result retrieval would be more > appropriate? Why? It is no different from now where you can reuse a cursor. > > Otherwise, that's a very nice addition, thanks! > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: