[BUGS] Improper const-evaluation of HAVING with grouping sets and subquerypullup
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | [BUGS] Improper const-evaluation of HAVING with grouping sets and subquerypullup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7dbdcf5c-b5a6-ef89-4958-da212fe10176@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Improper const-evaluation of HAVING with grouping sets and subquery pullup
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
This query produces an incorrect result: regression=# select four, x from (select four, ten, 'foo'::text as x from tenk1 ) as t group by grouping sets(four, x) having x = 'foo' order by four; four | x ------+----- 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | foo (5 rows) The "having x = 'foo'" clause should've filtered out the rows where x is NULL, leaving only the last row as the result. Even though x is a constant 'foo' in the subquery, HAVING clause is supposed to be evaluated after grouping. What happens is that subquery pullup replaces x with the constant, and the "'foo' = 'foo'" qual is later const-evaluated to true. I propose the attached patch to fix that. It forces the use of PlaceHolderVars in subquery pullup, if the parent query has grouping sets and HAVING. I'm not 100% sure that's the right approach or a misuse of the placeholder system, so comments welcome. At first, I tried to set wrap_non_vars=true only when processing the havingQual, so that placeholders would only be there. But that didn't work out, I think because grouping sets planning would then put both the Const, and the PlaceHolderVar for the Const, in the Agg's targetlist, but only one of them would be set to NULL when doing the grouping. Another thing is that the check could be made much tighter, so that PlaceHolderVars were only used for expressions actually used in the HAVING. But it didn't seem worth the trouble to me. - Heikki -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
Вложения
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: