Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7d44a67601f19440558ff698a31196d3.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, February 9, 2014 22:35, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 3.2.2014 07:53, Oleg Bartunov wrote: >> PS. I used data delicious-rss-1250k.gz from >> http://randomwalker.info/data/delicious/ > > I'm working on extending the GIN testing to include this test (and I'll > use it to test both for GIN and hstore-v2 patches). > > I do have the dataset, but I need the queries too - how did you generate > the queries for your benchmark? Do you have some query generator at hand? > > In your Dublin talk I see just this query type > > select count(*) from hs where h @> 'tags=>{{term=>NYC}}'; > > but that seems inadequate for representative benchmark. Are there other > types of queries that need to be tested / might be interesting? E.g. > queries with multiple search terms etc.? > There is the hstore operators table (Table F-6) that you can perhaps use to generate queries? (I am working on this too.) At least it contains already a handful of queries. To get at the bits in that table, perhaps the perl program attached here helps: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f29d70631e2046655c40dfcfce6db3c3.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl YMMV, I guess... Erik Rijkers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: