Re: Kernel cache vs shared_buffers
| От | Harald Armin Massa |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Kernel cache vs shared_buffers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7be3f35d0705130139o218a2a38l6471d6c8aeb1c71f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Kernel cache vs shared_buffers (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Kernel cache vs shared_buffers
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
> A common rule of thumb people quote here is to set shared_buffers to 1/4 > of available RAM, and leave the rest for OS cache. That's probably a > good configuration to start with. > And just for the record: This rule of thumb does NOT apply to PostgreSQL on Windows. My current rule of thumb on Windows: set shared_buffers to minimum * 2 Adjust effective_cache_size to the number given as "system cache" within the task manager. Harald -- GHUM Harald Massa persuadere et programmare Harald Armin Massa Reinsburgstraße 202b 70197 Stuttgart 0173/9409607 fx 01212-5-13695179 - Python: the only language with more web frameworks than keywords.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: