Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7bcbe906-b48c-3808-28a3-5fa9949a85a7@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Re: [HACKERS] logical replication - still unstable after all thesemonths |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 28/05/17 19:01, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > > So running in cloud land now...so for no errors - will update. > > > The framework ran 600 tests last night, and I see 3 'NOK' results, i.e 3 failed test runs (all scale 25 and 8 pgbench clients). Given the way the test decides on failure (gets tired of waiting for the table md5's to match) - it begs the question 'What if it had waited a bit longer'? However from what I can see in all cases: - the rowcounts were the same in master and replica - the md5 of pgbench_accounts was different ...so does seem possible that there is some bug being tickled here. Unfortunately the test framework blasts away the failed tables and subscription and continues on...I'm going to amend it to stop on failure so I can have a closer look at what happened. regards Mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: