Re: PGDG status and policy

On 10/18/18 3:36 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
> No, the *link* exists. The package doesn't (404 errors on, for example, 
> Centos 7 x86_64 and several others).

According to this:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/04a8f81ad82d272d031f43c9f6f742e2fd3fcd30.camel%40gunduz.org

it should be fixed now. A quick check seems to indicate it is.

> 
> Cheers,
> Steve
> 
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:22 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com 
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 10/18/18 3:02 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
>      > While looking to install version 11 I discovered that the PGDG Yum
>      > repository page at
>      > https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/ includes
>     repository
>      > RPMs for RHEL7  (x86_64 and ppc64Ie), and RHEL6 (x86_64 and i386).
>      >
>      > However there are no RPMs for version 6 of any derivatives (CentOS,
>      > Scientific, Oracle) and the RPMs for all the RHEL derivatives are
>     for
>      > ppc64Ie only.
> 
>     My guess is the code supplying the dropdowns has not been refreshed.
>     Looks like the packages do exist:
> 
>     https://yum.postgresql.org/repopackages.php
> 
>      >
>      > To what extent are the missing repos simply due to packagers
>     being busy
>      > and which are by policy? I looked for a packaging policy and
>     failed to
>      > find one. Does such a thing exist?
>      >
>      > Cheers,
>      > Steve
>      >
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Adrian Klaver
>     adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com