Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
От | Andreas Karlsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7b9b6804-1575-3502-d9c9-91d324c913bd@proxel.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/19/19 11:19 AM, Fred .Flintstone wrote: > PostgreSQL pollutes the file system with lots of binaries that it is > not obvious that they belong to PostgreSQL. > > Such as "/usr/bin/createdb", etc. > > It would be better if these files were renamed to be prefixed with > pg_, such as pg_createdb. > Or even better postgresql-createdb then be reachable by through a > "postgresql" wrapper script. Hi, This topic has been discussed before e.g. in 2008 in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/47EA5CC0.8040102%40sun.com and also more recently but I cannot find it in the archives right now. I am personally in favor of renaming e.g. createdb to pg_createdb, since it is not obvious that createdb belongs to PostgreSQL when reading a script or looking in /usr/bin, but we would need a some kind of deprecation cycle here or we would suddenly break tons of people's scripts. And as for the git-like solution with a wrapper script, that seems to be the modern way to do things but would be an even larger breakage and I am not convinced the advantage would be worth it especially since our executables are not as closely related and consistent as for example git's. Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: