Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7b5c224e-c9c0-fd93-2b51-b399de2d1d4b@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/25/22 13:52, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:36 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >> Create a CF entry for it, or enable CI on a github repo? > I created a CF entry for it. Then I had to try to Google around to > find the URL from the cfbot, because it's not even linked from > commitfest.postgresql.org for some reason. #blamemagnus > > I don't think that the Windows CI is running the TAP tests for > contrib. At least, I can't find any indication of it in the output. So > it doesn't really help to assess how portable this test is, unless I'm > missing something. > > I looked through the Linux output. It looks to me like that does run > the TAP tests for contrib. Unfortunately, the output is not in order > and is also not labelled, so it's hard to tell what output goes with > what contrib module. I named my test 001_basic.pl, but there are 12 of > those already. I see that 13 copies of 001_basic.pl seem to have > passed CI on Linux, so I guess the test ran and passed there. It seems > like it would be an awfully good idea to mention the subdirectory name > before each dump of output. Duplication of TAP test names has long been something that's annoyed me. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: