Re: [GENERAL] Failed dependencies for Pgadmin4 Web in Centos 7

On 04/24/2017 05:06 AM, Clodoaldo Neto wrote:
Please reply to list also
Ccing list

> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Adrian Klaver
> <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:

>
> I disabled the priorities plugin and got no excluded packages but still
> the same failed dependencies.
>
>
>         Installed Packages
>         pgadmin4-python-beautifulsoup4.noarch
>         4.5.1-2.rhel7                  @pgdg96
>         pgadmin4-python-fixtures.noarch
>         3.0.0-4.rhel7                  @pgdg96
>         pgadmin4-python-flask-principal.noarch
>         0.4.0-13.rhel7                 @pgdg96
>         pgadmin4-python-itsdangerous.noarch
>         0.24-9.rhel7                   @pgdg96
>
>         # yum install pgadmin4-v1-web
>
>
>     Do you have the PGDG repos installed on your machine?:
>
>     https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/
>     <https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/>
>
>     Or did you install the pgadmin4* packages above directly?
>
>
> I have the pgdg-96 repo installed.
>
> The first problem is that the four packages above have the "pgadmin4"
> string prefixed to their names whereas the spec file aks for the name
> without the prefix like in "pgadmin4-python-fixtures" vs "python-fixtures".

To be clear I am not a Yum/RPM expert.

Where is the spec file coming from?

>
> The second problem is that the other packages do not exist in pgdg-96 in
> either form.

Looks to me they do:

https://yum.postgresql.org/9.6/redhat/rhel-7-x86_64/

>
> IMHO prefixing the package names with "pgadmin4" just adds confusion as
> there will be different packages installing the same file names in the
> same places. The different repo sources can be managed with priorities
> if necessary.
>
> Clodoaldo
>



--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com